NU-664B Week 7 Assignment 2: Comprehensive Case Study
NU-664B Week 7 Assignment 2: Comprehensive Case Study
NU-664B Week 7 Assignment 2: Comprehensive Case Study
Gradebook Category: Assignments—Comprehensive Case Study
Introduction
For this assignment, you will be completing an interactive case study electronically. You will progress through a patient case much like you would in practice. You will need to make decisions for your patient as you complete the case and provide a rationale for your answers and decisions. You will have one attempt to complete this assignment, which must be completed in one sitting.
Once you have completed your Comprehensive Case Study, save your Summary, and then upload it to Dropbox for grading.
Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NU-664B Week 7 Assignment 2: Comprehensive Case Study done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
To Submit Your Assignment:
Select the Add Submissions button.
Drag or upload your files to the File Picker.
Select Save Changes.
Submission status
Submission statusSubmitted for gradingGrading statusGradedTime remainingAssignment was submitted 5 hours 38 mins earlyLast modifiedSunday, 19 February 2023, 6:16 PMFile submissionsClinical Progressive Case Study.pdfTurnitin ID: 201809329721%19 February 2023, 6:16 PMSubmission commentsComments (0)
Once you have completed the activities in this scenario and selected submitted, you will be unable to go back and change your answers.
Your Medical Assistant Has Given You The Following Information
An 80-year-old male patient, Gene Upshaw, comes in to see the primary care NP complaining of feeling “lightheaded.”
The MA completed vital signs per protocol and did orthostatic BPs since the patient was lightheaded.
Vital Signs
Temp: 98.9
Respiratory Rate: 18
Blood Pressures / Heart Rate:
Laying – 142/72 – 76
Sitting – 120/66 – 72
Standing – 90/50 – 72
Pain: 4/10
NU-664B Week 7 Assignment 2: Comprehensive Case Study Rubric
CriteriaExemplaryExceeds ExpectationsAdvancedMeets ExpectationsIntermediateNeeds ImprovementNoviceInadequateTotal PointsApproach to Patient CareApproach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 0 errors.10 pointsApproach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.7 pointsApproach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.5 pointsApproach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.3 points10Differential Diagnoses (Including Problems)All required differential diagnoses and problems are included (including worst case) and fully supported by findings.Rationale for all differential diagnoses provided.20 pointsMost required differential diagnoses and/or problems are included (including worst case); one is not supported by findings.Rationale for most differential diagnoses provided.18 pointsSome required differential diagnoses or problems are included (not including worst case); two are not fully supported by findings.Rationale for some differential diagnoses provided.14 pointsFew required differential diagnoses or problems are included; more than two are not fully supported by findings.Rationale provided for few differential diagnoses.9 points20Case Specific questions and RationaleLogical and systematic organization of data.Rationale provided for all answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 0 errors.Correct terminology, spelling, and grammar.20 pointsLogical and systematic organization of data.Rationale provided for most answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.Terminology, spelling or grammar errors (1–3).15 pointsMinor errors in organization of data.Rationale provided for some answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.Terminology, spelling, or grammar errors (4–6).11 pointsDisorganized flow of data.Rationale provided for few answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.Terminology, spelling, or grammar errors (>6).6 points20PlanComprehensive plan includes all components with no errors: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Nonpharmacologic intervention Referrals Follow-up50 pointsPlan missing 1 of the identified components or plan is based on current evidence, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Nonpharmacologic intervention Referrals Follow-up40 pointsPlan missing 2 of the identified components or plan is based on current evidence, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Nonpharmacologic intervention Referrals Follow-up30 pointsPlan missing >3 of the identified components and/or has safety Concerns or is based on current evidence, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Nonpharmacologic intervention Referrals Follow-up20 points50Total Points100
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order
