0 Comments

NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 1: Organizational Readiness Assessment

NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 1 Organizational Readiness Assessment
NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 1: Organizational Readiness Assessment

How do you determine organizational readiness to implement change in your practice or organization? Are the individuals committed to making the change? Are they confident in the impact of the change? Are they prepared to face challenges?

Photo Credit: RoosterHD / E+ / Getty Images

The answers to these questions, and others, may provide insight into the readiness of an organization to implement change. Understanding an organization’s readiness provides critical insight into building a team, identifying stakeholders, and ultimately moving forward with a proposed change. As a nurse leader, it will be important to determine the organizational readiness and motivating factors of individuals associated with the organization to implement change.
For this Assignment, complete the Organizational Readiness Form to assist you in determining the readiness for implementing change. Utilizing this form, you will explore the importance of organizational readiness with your team and other stakeholders.

To Prepare

Determine who is a part of the team needed to address your problem.
Ensure your problem is clearly defined and shared with your team.

The Assignment: (1–2 pages and completed Organizational Readiness Form)

Meet with teams associated with your practice problem to gather information about the problem. With the guidance of the team, answer the following questions:

What is the practice problem?
What are the real or perceived impacts of the problem?
Is the problem defined correctly?
Who are the stakeholders?

Consider the following:

Are the right people at the table?
What is their level of engagement with the problem?
Are there internal/external stakeholders?

After answering the questions, provide an assessment for organizational readiness.  Additionally, complete the Organizational Readiness Form provided to you in the Learning Resources. Note: You will be submitting your responses to the prompts for this Assignment and a completed Organizational Readiness Form in the Assignment submission link for this week.

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 1: Organizational Readiness Assessment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet my deadline

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3.

Note: You will use this input to create a compelling vision for the change in upcoming weeks.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 3 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 3 Assignment 1

Name: NURS_8502_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 1 Organizational Readiness Assessment

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
Include in-text citations in your response
Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
Follow APA-7th edition
Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
Follow APA 7th edition
Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
Here are some helpful links
Student paper example
Citing Sources
The Writing Center is a great resource

 
 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 1: Organizational Readiness Assessment

Grid View
List View

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor

Identify the problem

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately and clearly identifies the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the problem identified.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response accurately identifies the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the problem identified.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the problem identified.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the problem to be addressed at the organization, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the problem identified, or it is missing.

Identify the real or perceived impacts of the problem.

Points Range: 13 (13%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately and clearly identifies the impacts of the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully supports the impacts of the problem identified.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response accurately identifies the impacts of the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that supports the impacts of the problem identified.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the impacts of the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the impacts of the problem identified.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the impacts of the problem to be addressed at the organization, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the impacts of the problem identified, or it is missing.

Describe whether or not the problem is identified correctly.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response comprehensively and fully explains whether the problem is correctly identified.
The response accurately and clearly analyzes the problem identification as it relates to the organization, providing relevant, specific, and appropriate examples to support the problem identification.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response explains whether or not the problem is correctly identified.
The response analyzes the problem identification as it relates to the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the problem identification.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether or not the problem is correctly identified.
The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the problem identification as it relates to the organization.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the problem identification.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether or not the problem is correctly identified, or it is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes the problem identification as it relates to the organization, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the problem identification, or it is missing.

Identify the stakeholders.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders associated with the problem.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples of the identified stakeholders.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response accurately identifies the stakeholders associated with the problem.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the identified stakeholders.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the stakeholders associated with the problem.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the identified stakeholders.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the stakeholders associated with the problem, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identified stakeholders, or it is missing.

Complete the Organizational Readiness Form.

Points Range: 17 (17%) – 17 (17%)

A completed Organizational Readiness Form is submitted.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

An incomplete Organizational Readiness Form is submitted, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: 
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: 
Correct grammar

Order Solution Now

Categories: