NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis
NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis
NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines Quality of life (QoL) as a person’s view of their situation in life in the perspective of the culture and value systems where they live, and with regard to their expectations, goals, standards, and concerns (Sarwar et al., 2019). It is the physical and mental health that a person perceives over time. QoL is further defined as how a person is healthy, comfortable, and able to engage in or take pleasure in life events. The term QoL is innately ambiguous since it can refer to an individual’s experience of their life and the living conditions in which people find themselves (Sarwar et al., 2019). The purpose of this assignment is to describe the defining attributes of QoL, the antecedent and consequence, create a model case, and theoretically apply the concept.
Three Defining Attributes
The three defining attributes of QoL are: A feeling of satisfaction with one’s life generally; A satisfactory state of physical, emotional, social, and mental health as established by the person referred to; The mental ability to establish one’s own life as satisfactory (Van Leeuwen et al., 2019). For example, for a person to say they have a good QoL, they need to be satisfied with their overall life. Besides, they should be satisfied with their physical, emotional, social, and mental health. They should be satisfied with their body’s physiological performance to have balance and harmony with themselves and others. They should also have a positive self-esteem and body image and positive and productive social interactions, personal relationships, and social support (Van Leeuwen et al., 2019). Lastly, a person with a good QoL exhibits the mental ability to assess their life as satisfactory.
Antecedent and Consequence of The Concept
An antecedent is not necessarily a causative factor, but it is important for the concept to occur and can contribute to its cause. An antecedent of QoL is an individual’s ability to make a decision (Haraldstad et al., 2019). An individual may feel that it is important to get on with life. However, the decision often depends on the limitations their QoL imposes, such as physical activity and socialization levels. Individuals evaluate their lives and make decisions, which can sometimes improve or worsen their QoL (Haraldstad et al., 2019). On the other hand, consequences refer to factors that follow the occurrence. A consequence of QoL is acceptance of one’s circumstances. The results of a positive QoL are coping, adaptation, and satisfaction with life (Haraldstad et al., 2019). However, the results of a negative QoL are a lack of satisfaction and risk-taking behavior beyond that of a person’s age.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Model Case
A model case is an example of the use of a concept that shows all of its defining attributes. The following is a model case for QoL: A 32-year-old man gets home from work one evening. As he parks his SUV in the parking lot next to his wife’s car, his two children, 5-year-old and 3-year-old, run and scream with joy to welcome him home. He can also see his wife smiling and waving at him at the door. The children hug him and help him carry some snacks he brought for them. When he gets to the house, his wife hugs and welcomes him and offers him a cup of tea. He sits and tells himself, “I have the life I was dreaming of; there is nothing I wish to change.” He reflects on how lucky he is to have a happy family, a successful business, good health, and supportive friends. Many people look upon him and wish their life was a fraction of his.
The model case demonstrates the quality of life. The three defining attributes are presented in the case. The man has an overall sense of happiness and satisfaction with his life. He has the mental ability to evaluate his life. Besides, he feels he is in good health since he can do the things he wishes to. Furthermore, other people also assess her life be of quality.
Theoretical Applications of the Concept
Peplau’s nursing theory applies to the concept of QoL. QoL is entrenched in Peplau’s theory as an indefinable, extensive phenomenon. Peplau considers QoL as a subjective view of the condition of an individual’s life, which is equal to a person’s wellbeing and psychological wellness and often connected with health (Hagerty et al., 2018). A relationship is fundamental in Peplau’s theory, whereas QoL is considered a by-product of the relationship and thus significant to the theory. Peplau proposed that QoL is mostly a subjective perception and varies with changing conditions; (time and situation-dependent) (Hagerty et al., 2018). Nonetheless, QoL is considered an intangible quality in the theory.
Reflection
QoL concept applies to advanced nursing practice (APN) since APRNs must understand that QoL is the degree to which individuals enjoy a good life. Besides, APRNs should understand that a person enjoys a good life when they attain a balance in their relations with themselves and others by creating and maintaining adequate conditions and personal potentials over the life course. QoL, without a doubt, is relevant to APN practice. Patients often consult NP on how to achieve the best possible QoL for themselves or their loved ones. For an NP to help these patients and their families, they must themselves reflect on what is meant by QOL.
NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis References
Hagerty, T. A., Samuels, W., Norcini-Pala, A., & Gigliotti, E. (2018). Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations: An Alternate Factor Structure for Patient Experience Data?. Nursing science quarterly, 30(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318417693286
Haraldstad, K., Wahl, A., Andenæs, R., Andersen, J. R., Andersen, M. H., Beisland, E., … & Helseth, S. (2019). A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Quality of life Research, 28(10), 2641-2650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9
Sarwar, S., Aleem, A., & Nadeem, M. A. (2019). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and its correlation with academic performance of medical students. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 35(1), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.1.147
Van Leeuwen, K. M., Van Loon, M. S., Van Nes, F. A., Bosmans, J. E., De Vet, H. C., Ket, J. C., … & Ostelo, R. W. (2019). What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis. PloS one, 14(3), e0213263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213263
I really love the concept of health literacy. I think that it is an important topic when discussing care and the understanding of patient needs. Currently, I work in the South Bronx and find that there is a great need for understanding and interpretation of healthcare information. We have care plan meetings with patients and families that can sometimes be very frustrating. The social workers present documents for the patients to sign and they refuse. I have identified the need to present documents to patients in a private setting and offer assistance to completing the paperwork. As a healthcare provider, we cannot take for granted that the patient can read or understand the content of the instructions. Limited levels of education or understanding may be present. Healthcare information is pertinent to their care. Surgical follow up care, medication review, treatment instructions and discharge planning. I agree that the provider communication has a major impact on patient outcomes. Our communication and delivery method is key to the interpreting healthcare information. If traditional methods of communication are not successful, there are many ways to deliver effective healthcare information to patients/families. Technology has offered alternative methods of delivering healthcare information if a patient/family has difficulty in literacy. As a nurse and a patient advocate, I want to make certain that my patient can continue the plan of care for the best results/outcomes.
Logan,R.A.(2016).Robert A Logan- Seeking an expanded,multidimensional conceptual approach to health literacy and health disparities research.Information & use,36 (3/4),217-241
Select a nursing concept (be sure to use a nursing theory) and then provide a response to each one of the steps included in a concept analysis regarding your selected concept. This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation to the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include a scholarly reference.
Participation for MSN
Participation Guidelines
Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.
Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.
Requirements:
Description of the Assignment
1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required
NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis
threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.
The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
2. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis
The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
3. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
4. For week 8 only: Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.
Posting Requirements:
The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
Criteria for Content
Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis Grading Rubric
Performance Category
100% or highest level of performance
100%
16 points
Very good or high level of performance
88%
14 points
Acceptable level of performance
81%
13 points
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68%
11 points
Deficient level of performance
56%
9 points
Failing level
of performance
55% or less
0 points
Total Points Possible= 50
16 Points
14 Points
13 Points
11 Points
9 Points
0 Points
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
16 Points
14 Points
13 Points
11 Points
9 Points
0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
Applies fa
