NUR 590 APA, GCU Library Resources, and Scholarly Research
NUR 590 APA, GCU Library Resources, and Scholarly Research
NUR 590 APA, GCU Library Resources, and Scholarly Research
Description:
Complete the quiz, which covers Topic 6, APA format, library resources, and scholarly research skills. This is a timed quiz, lasting 60 minutes.
Topic 6 Participation
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NUR 590 APA, GCU Library Resources, and Scholarly Research done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Description:
NA
Topic 6: Role of Research and Research Process for Advanced Registered Nurses
Description
Objectives:
Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse.
2. Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research.
3. Relate credibility to academic integrity and evidence-based practice expectations .
El Study Materials
NUR 590 APA, GCU Library Resources, and Scholarly Research
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Description:
Read Chapters 20-22 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
Information Literacy: The Perils of Online Research
Description:
Watch “Information Literacy: The Perils of Online Research,” by Cambridge Educational (2006), available through Films on Demand in the GCU Libra1y.
Effective Internet Search: Basic Tools and Advanced Strategies
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 APA, GCU Library Resources, and Scholarly Research
Description:
Watch “Effective Internet Search: Basic Tools and Advanced Strategies,” by Cambridge Educational (201 !) , available through Films on Demand in the GCU Libra1y.
Researching, Reading, and Writing
Description:
Watch “Researching, Reading, and Writing,” by Cambridge Educational (2009), available through Films on Demand in the GCU Library.
A Scholar Is What a Scholar Writes: Practical Tips on Scholarly Writing
Description:
Read “A Scholar Is What a Scholar Writes: Practical Tips on Scholarly Writing,” by Walker, from Journal of Theory Construction & Testing (2003).
Library Walkthrough Tutorial
Description:
Watch the “Library Wall Through Tutorial” to become familiar· with the GCU Libra1y.
Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis
Description:
Read “Critically Analyzing Info1mation Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis,” located on the Comell University Library website.
About Turnitin and Plagiarism
Description:
Read the “About Turnitin” and “Plagiarism” sections of the Academic Integrity page of the GCU website.
GCU Library: General Research Guide
Description:
Review the “General Research” guide , located on the GCU Library website.
GCU Library: Persistent Links Research Guide
Description:
Review the “Persistent Links” research guide, located on the GCU Libra1y website, to learn how to locate persistent links for library articles, videos, etc.
RefWorks from the GCU Library
Description:
Manage your citations with the Refworks tool, located on the GCU Libra1y website. Refworks automates the creation of your reference lists in the fo1mat of your choice (APA, JIILA, etc.).
GCU Library: Nursing and Health Sciences Research Guide
Description:
Review the “Nursing and Health Sciences” research guide, located on the GCU Library website .
II Tasks
Topic 6 DQ 1
Description:
Review the evidence-based practice project ideas you described in Topic 5 DQ I. Based on yow· initial ideas, what types of scholarly nursing research (such as quantitative or qualitative research, peer-reviewed resources , etc. ) would be required to fu1ther investigate the issue? Identify the criteria you would use to evaluate the appropriateness of the research. Why is it impo1tant to select research that meets these criteria?
Topic 6 DQ 2
Description:
Imagine the following scenario: You are taking the evidence-based practice course and one of your classmates shares an EBP project draft with you. You notice that some of the research has not been cited c01Tectly or even at all. When you approach your classmate , the response is that “no one will notice and it is not a big deal anyway.” What are your next steps in speaking with your classmate? Consider how this could reflect on the credibility and integrity of the individuals involved , the University, and the profession .
The evidence-based project I chose to discuss was the issue of patients needing to be referred to hospice care earlier. Types of scholarly nursing research that would be required to further investigate this issue include quantitative studies on quality of life and length of lifespan for patients who are enrolled in hospice as compared to patients who are not enrolled in hospice. Quantitative research regarding nursing education about end of life decision making and hospice in relation to when end of life discussions are had with patients and when referrals to hospice are made would also be beneficial. Qualitative research on patient perceptions of their experiences regarding end of life decisions when they are in hospice versus not in hospice could also be helpful. Qualitative research regarding nurse’s perceptions of end of life care and barriers they encounter in having end of life discussions with patients are also essential.
The New Jersey Institute of Technology [NJIT] (2022) published a guide called the CRAAP test that evaluates the legitimacy of evidence-based research. This tool looks at five aspects of research, including currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. It is important that research meet these criteria, as these criteria ensure that research used in academic papers is high quality and legitimate information that can be trusted. Publication of research studies alone does not guarantee quality, value, or applicability to clinical practice (Milner, 2021). Research must be critically assessed to determine the quality of the evidence and the CRAAP test is a quality tool that can be utilized to do this.
The criteria used to evaluate a research article based on the CRAAP test can be demonstrated to evaluate a research article titled, “Timely Referral to Hospice Care for Oncology Patients: A Retrospective Review” (Mulville et al., 2019). The first criterion, currency, looks at the timeliness of the information (NJIT, 2022). For this article, the data collected was from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 and the article was published in 2019 (Mulville et al., 2019). This article was published recently, but the data it is based on is slightly outdated, as it is 7 years old.
The second criterion, relevance, looks at the importance of the information for my specific research needs (NJIT, 2022). The target audience for this article is healthcare professionals who can help remove barriers to referring patients to hospice earlier (Mulville et al., 2019). The information directly relates to the practice issue I am addressing, is written at an appropriate academic level, and is an article I would be comfortable using in an academic research paper.
The third criterion, authority, looks at the source of the information, (NJIT, 2022). The information in this study was collected from the cancer registry database at the Watson Clinic LLP Cancer and Research Center, which is a nonacademic, free-standing community cancer center that is accredited by the Commission on Cancer (Mulville et al., 2019). This study was also funded by the Watson Clinic Center for Research. The primary author has a Bachelor of Science degree, the second author has no credentials listed, and the third author is a medical doctor. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. There is an email address provided to contact the primary author and is also a link with information about the primary author’s workplace and published works.
The fourth criterion, accuracy, looks at the reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the content (NJIT, 2022). The information comes from data collected from a cancer database that was then compared and analyzed (Mulville et al., 2019). The demographics and analyzation methods used to draw conclusions is clearly outlined in the article. The article was also published in a peer reviewed journal. The tone of the article is unbiased and only presents the facts and there are no spelling or grammatical errors. The authors also acknowledge the limitations of the study.
The fifth criterion, purpose, looks at the reason the information exists (NJIT, 2022). The purpose of this research study is to inform healthcare professionals about the barriers to earlier referrals to hospice (Mulville et al., 2019). The purpose is clearly stated in the article, along with the authors’ conclusions about ways to earlier refer patients to hospice. This information is factual, based on analysis of actual data from 413 cancer patients. The point of view appears to be objective and impartial, as the people who would financially benefit from the information in this study are insurance companies and hospices, and the article was not written by either of these groups of people. The article does not appear to have any biases.
References
Milner, K. (2021). Evidence-based practice. In S. M. DeNisco (Ed.), Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (4th ed., pp. 561-594). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13: 9781284176124
Mulville, A. K., Widick, N. N., & Makani, N. S. (2019). Timely referral to hospice care for oncology patients: A retrospective review. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, 36(6), 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909118820494
New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2022). How to evaluate information sources: CRAAP test. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order
