Trident MIC 100- module 4 slp 2018
Trident MIC 100- module 4 slp 2018
Trident MIC 100- module 4 slp 2018
Bioremediation is the use of organisms like bacteria, archea
or fungi to metabolize pollutants. Instead of simply collecting the pollutant,
bioremediation relies on living organisms to consume and break down the
compound, turning it into a natural, harmless product. This technique is often
used to help clean up major oil spills. Watch the following video and article
link to learn more:
Oil-Eating Bacteria Could Be a Solution to Spill Cleanups.
National Geographic. Accessed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPgLJrk0sGQ on
September 14, 2016.
Prokaryotes and Environmental Bioremediation.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Trident MIC 100- module 4 slp 2018 done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Cover
Address the following questions in essay format:
Research a microbe that can be used in bioremediation and
provide the following information:
1) Provide the scientific name and identification of the
bacteria that is used in bioremediation. How is it classified? Give a brief
description of your bacteria. What is it’s normal environment?
2) Which biogeochemical cycle does the bacterium participate
in (Carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus cycling)? How is this important to its role
in bioremediation?
3) How are bacteria as a whole being genetically modified to
improve bioremediation?
3) What are some limitations to using bacteria for
bioremediation?
SLP Assignment Expectations
Page Length: 2 to 3 pages
Format
TUI encourages all students to comply with APA style and
format guidelines for proper citation of references. Use the formatting in your Background page as
a model for citing sources from the SLP assignment.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Trident MIC 100- module 4 slp 2018
Trident MIC 100- module 4 slp 2018
Scholarly Content
Your case assignments are considered scholarly works. Your
final work should include peer reviewed (scholarly) sources.
Please keep in mind that you should not use sources such as
“Answers.com” or “Wikipedia” or “Wikianswers.”
None of these are scholarly sources and they can be “modified” by any
registered user which makes them unreliable. Upload your final word document to
the SLP dropbox.
Assignment Rubric
Excellent Good Fair Poor
In 3–4 pages, address the following:
A description of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test you were assigned is used in healthcare.
o What is its purpose?
o How is it conducted?
o What information does it gather? Points Range: 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)
The response clearly, accurately, and with specific detail describes how the assessment tool or diagnostic test assigned is used in healthcare, including its purpose, how it is conducted, and what information it gathers. Points Range: 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)
The response accurately describes how the assessment tool or diagnostic test assigned is used in healthcare, including its purpose, how it is conducted, and what information it gathers. Points Range: 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)
The response vaguely and/or with some inaccuracy describes how the assessment tool or diagnostic test assigned is used in healthcare, including its purpose, how it is conducted, and what information it gathers. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response is inaccurate or missing descriptions of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test assigned is used in healthcare, including its purpose, how it is conducted, and what information it gathers.
Based on your research, evaluate the test or the tool’s validity and reliability, and explain any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
The response accurately and thoroughly evaluates the test or tool’s validity and reliability, and explains any issues with clear sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Student’s research is clear, accurate, and appropriate for the evaluation. Points Range: 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)
The response accurately evaluates the test or tool’s validity and reliability, and explains any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Student’s research is somewhat clear, accurate,and appropriate for the evaluation. Points Range: 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)
The response vaguely and/or with some inaccuracy evaluates the test or tool’s validity and reliability, and explains any issues with some sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Student’s research is vague or inaccurate for the evaluation. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 32 (32%)
“The response is inaccurate and/or missing evaluations of the test or tool’s validity and reliability, with explanations of any issues missing or lacking sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Student’s research is missing, inaccurate, or lacking for the evaluation.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Check Out also: Trident Module 1 case 2018
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order
